Reported
75+resident meetings reported by organizers
A conservative organizer attestation, not an independently audited total.
Eight years of resident organizing · evidence review September 3, 2026
75+ meetings. Residents kept showing up.
This is not a one-day objection. It is a sustained, resident-led campaign that has outlasted changing proposals and still lacks a current, enforceable answer for every household.
They did not show up once. They built a movement.
Each number keeps its own evidence boundary. Meetings, organizing dates, petition signatures and transport are not added into a synthetic engagement score.
Reported
27organizing dates supported by private records
The records show meetings scheduled or confirmed; only three dates have stronger occurrence evidence. This is not a held-meeting total.
Reported
538signatures displayed by the petition page
A dynamic Change.org display count. This review did not independently verify the signers.
Reported
1 bus+organized transport to County Hall
The campaign account reports a bus and additional cars; the reviewed source does not establish a numeric attendance total.
Eight years of organizing. Still no enforceable answer.
Reported
Residents formed two associations
Sunnyland and Trinidad Court residents organized with legal-services support.
Reported
Conditions became a public-rights record
Residents documented flooding, sanitation and management concerns through organizing and reporting.
Reported
More than 100 notices were publicly reported
That is a reported historical figure, not an audited current eviction or household count.
Official record
The redevelopment application entered the County file
The applicant-commissioned study contains historical 247- and 306-space figures and a 76-space northern count. None is a verified current resident count.
Reported
Residents carried the campaign to County Hall
The campaign documented organized transport to a County budget hearing. This establishes mobilization, not a County commitment.
Applicant representation
A 74-home Phase I plan entered the record
Seventy-four refers to mobile homes in the applicant plan—not residents, people, or a current household census.
Applicant representation
The relocation proposal changed for a fourth time
A fourth applicant amendment is in the file. Filing it does not make its terms County-approved or enforceable.
Official record
Reviews continued; a key study was not located by title
The file includes a second environmental review, a zoning-enforcement memorandum and a signed Parks review. In the reviewed attachment manifest, we have not located a separate Soar-specific 2026 transportation or feasibility study. That bounded search is not proof that no such record exists.
Official record
Still deferred. Still no hearing date.
The County page lists CDMP20230012 as deferred with the hearing date to be determined. Deferred does not mean stopped, denied or withdrawn.
Do not thank residents for showing up. Answer them.
Before any action on CDMP20230012, publish any existing current aggregate records of household, occupancy, relocation and other outcomes, identify gaps or unavailable data, and publish the sworn information, relocation terms, capacity evidence and agency reviews required at the applicable stage. Do not publish resident identities or create a resident-level public ledger.
Turn this record into pressureHow to read the estimates
Organizers conservatively attest to more than 75 resident meetings. A cadence check estimates roughly 40–44 meeting opportunities in the last year and about 92 across two years; these are not verified held-meeting totals. Twenty-seven private-record dates show scheduled or confirmed organizing, and three have stronger occurrence evidence. Private messages and resident identities are not published.